This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
differences_from_shadowlandian [2023/01/15 14:43] – [Pronouns] morgoth | differences_from_shadowlandian [2023/09/07 19:38] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<WRAP center round todo 60%> | <WRAP center round todo 60%> | ||
**WARNING: | **WARNING: | ||
+ | |||
< | < | ||
</ | </ | ||
Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
Shadowlandian treated the suffix //-at// as infinitive or 3rd person singular marker. PE#17 states, that //-at// is a suffix of // | Shadowlandian treated the suffix //-at// as infinitive or 3rd person singular marker. PE#17 states, that //-at// is a suffix of // | ||
- | To resolve ambiguity, Nûrlâm introduced new suffix for [[grammar_infinitive|pure infinitive]], | + | To resolve ambiguity, Nûrlâm introduced new suffix for [[grammar_infinitive|pure infinitive]], |
Nûrlâm also changed verbs' singular marker from //-at// to //-â(t)// (//-t-// is inserted only if other suffix starting with vowel follows 3rd person marker). | Nûrlâm also changed verbs' singular marker from //-at// to //-â(t)// (//-t-// is inserted only if other suffix starting with vowel follows 3rd person marker). | ||
Line 37: | Line 38: | ||
Personal pronouns differ in all Neo-Black Speech dialects. Nûrlâm had to do it too. In PE#17 it is stated that "the verbal system [of Black Speech] must have included pronominal suffixes expressing the object, as well as those indicating the subject" | Personal pronouns differ in all Neo-Black Speech dialects. Nûrlâm had to do it too. In PE#17 it is stated that "the verbal system [of Black Speech] must have included pronominal suffixes expressing the object, as well as those indicating the subject" | ||
- | Nûrlâm supports subdialects. So-called " | + | Nûrlâm supports subdialects. So-called |
Demonstrative, | Demonstrative, |